Note low (anonymous) argument count in conventions
authorSiraaj Khandkar <siraaj@khandkar.net>
Wed, 7 Jan 2015 02:12:48 +0000 (21:12 -0500)
committerSiraaj Khandkar <siraaj@khandkar.net>
Wed, 7 Jan 2015 02:12:48 +0000 (21:12 -0500)
README.md

index d9b4464..5f2ed6c 100644 (file)
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -36,6 +36,16 @@ else, these are influenced by Jane Street's Core of the OCaml world.
 - Names of public records _must_ be fully qualified, such as: `#hope_module_record{}`
 - Names of all modules _must_ be fully qualified, such as: `hope_module` (this
   should go without saying, but just to be sure...)
+- Keep the number of (anonymous) arguments "reasonably" low:
+    + up to 3 is normal
+    + 4 is suspicious but may be reasonable
+    + 5 is _very_ suspicious and probably unnecessary
+    + more than 5 is unacceptable, so consider reducing by:
+        1. revising abstractions, or, if not practical
+        2. creating a public record specifically for the purpose of passing
+           many arguents, which simulates labeled arguments. For an example see
+           https://github.com/ibnfirnas/oauth1_core where I used that technique
+           extensively (especially in oauth1_server.erl)
 
 
 Abstractions
This page took 0.018254 seconds and 4 git commands to generate.